EdTech · Educational platforms
Protect learners — with verification you can defend
Educational products often serve minors by design. Self-declared age is not enough under Lei Felca — you need trustworthy age assurance, parental linkage where required, and records when regulators, families, or auditors ask for proof.
Why this matters
EdTech platforms operate where minors are part of the audience — not an edge case. Weak age gates and fragmented records create legal exposure, loss of trust with families, and operational risk at scale.
Minor protection
Reliable age assurance and content access by maturity level — not a checkbox students can bypass.
Parental consent
Structured identity signals that support guardian verification and supervision tools your product team can program.
Compliance and evidence
Traceable decisions and records for LGPD, DPO review, and regulatory diligence under Lei Felca.
What EdTech teams face
Enrollment must stay smooth enough to convert — yet strict enough to protect minors and sensitive content. Balancing both with fragmented tools is where most platforms lose control.
- Age checkbox at signup anyone can tick without consequence.
- Underage accounts and shared devices slipping through weak flows.
- Sensitive courses or features without a consistent age gate.
- Different rules on web, mobile, and partner integrations — inconsistent outcomes.
- Children's data processed without clear governance or audit trail.
- Testing a new verification flow without affecting real students becomes a side project.
How Qonclor helps
You gain infrastructure focused on identity and age decisions — with outputs your product, compliance, and operations teams can use and explain.
One flow across surfaces
Document, selfie, and official data on the same path — fewer vendors, less integration debt, fewer failure points.
Clear outcome: allow, block, or review
Structured decisions with confidence and risk — without interpreting raw third-party payloads in production.
History when someone asks
Every check leaves a trail. Legal and leadership can look it up without patching spreadsheets.
Data handled with care
We minimize what we process and store — less exposure for learners and for you under LGPD.
Test before going live
Tune policies and flows in a safe environment before they affect real students.
Operations dashboard
Volume, exceptions, and trends visible to product, compliance, and operations.
How it works in practice
- 1
Define when to verify — signup, course enrollment, feature unlock, or revalidation.
- 2
The user or guardian submits document, selfie, or data; Qonclor checks behind the scenes.
- 3
You receive the result: allow, block, or route to manual review.
- 4
Your platform applies the rule; Qonclor keeps the record.
- 5
Your team monitors in the dashboard — no scramble when a request lands.
Frequently asked questions
Does Qonclor replace pedagogy or content moderation?
No. We specialize in identity and age verification decisions. Curriculum, instructional design, and content policies stay with you — we take the weight of reliable age assurance off your plate.
How does this relate to Lei Felca?
Lei Felca sets expectations for protecting minors in digital environments, including trustworthy age checks where self-declaration is not enough. See our ECA Digital page for context — we support your verification layer; your counsel validates your full compliance program.
Does it work for users in Brazil?
Yes. The flow is built for the Brazilian market, including CPF validation and biometric confirmation, at the pace educational platforms need.
Do you store identity evidence forever?
Not necessarily. You define retention; sensitive evidence can be discarded after verification while keeping a record of the decision.
Ready to strengthen protection on your educational platform?
Tell us how you operate today — surfaces, volume, and what keeps your team up at night. We will put together a focused demo, no strings attached.
This page describes product capabilities. For legal and regulatory decisions, consult your advisors.